Loading
Loading
Practice Area
Safeguarding fundamental rights and public interest
Articles in the Indian Constitution, the longest written constitution globally
Constitutional amendments reflecting India's evolving legal framework
Exercising writ jurisdiction across India's states and territories
Categories guaranteed under Part III of the Constitution
Constitutional law in India forms the supreme legal bedrock upon which all other laws and governmental actions rest. The Constitution of India, adopted on 26th January 1950, is the longest written constitution in the world, containing 470 articles across 25 parts, 12 schedules, and over 100 amendments. It establishes the framework of the Indian polity including the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary, and enshrines Fundamental Rights (Part III) that are justiciable and enforceable through writ jurisdiction. The doctrine of basic structure, established in the landmark Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), ensures that even constitutional amendments cannot alter the essential features of the Constitution, providing an enduring check on legislative overreach.
The writ jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 32 and the High Courts under Article 226 forms the primary mechanism for enforcement of fundamental rights. Citizens can seek writs of Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, and Quo Warranto to challenge unconstitutional state action, arbitrary executive decisions, and legislative infirmities. Public Interest Litigation (PIL), a uniquely Indian innovation in constitutional jurisprudence, has democratized access to justice by allowing any public-spirited person to approach the courts on behalf of those unable to seek judicial remedies themselves. The Supreme Court and High Courts have used PIL to address issues ranging from environmental degradation and prisoner rights to custodial violence and education access.
Our constitutional law practice encompasses the full spectrum of constitutional adjudication, from filing and defending writ petitions before the Supreme Court and High Courts to advising governmental bodies on the constitutional validity of proposed legislation and executive actions. We handle matters involving fundamental rights violations, challenges to the constitutional validity of statutes, disputes between the Union and States, election-related constitutional questions, and administrative law matters involving principles of natural justice and judicial review. Our team also advises on emerging constitutional questions relating to privacy rights (post-Puttaswamy), digital rights, and the interplay of fundamental rights with directive principles in an evolving socio-legal landscape.
Governing Framework
What We Offer
Drafting, filing, and arguing writ petitions before the Supreme Court of India and High Courts for enforcement of fundamental rights, including challenges to arbitrary government orders, unconstitutional laws, and violations of principles of natural justice.
Initiating and prosecuting public interest litigation on matters of wide public concern including environmental protection, consumer rights, education access, healthcare, and governmental accountability, ensuring compliance with PIL filing guidelines established by the Supreme Court.
Challenging the vires of Central and State legislation on grounds of legislative competence (Article 246), violation of fundamental rights (Part III), or contravention of the basic structure doctrine, including representation before Constitution Benches of the Supreme Court.
Representing individuals and organizations in matters involving violation of the right to equality (Articles 14-18), freedoms under Article 19, right to life and personal liberty (Article 21), right against exploitation (Articles 23-24), religious freedom (Articles 25-28), and educational and cultural rights (Articles 29-30).
Filing RTI applications under the Right to Information Act, 2005, pursuing First Appeals before designated appellate authorities and Second Appeals before State Information Commissions and the Central Information Commission, and challenging unjust denials of information.
Challenging administrative decisions, quasi-judicial orders, and delegated legislation on grounds of illegality, irrationality, or procedural impropriety, including matters before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), State Administrative Tribunals, and appellate courts.
Filing complaints and representing victims before the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and State Human Rights Commissions (SHRCs) for violations of human rights by public authorities, including custodial deaths, extrajudicial actions, and discrimination.
Providing pre-legislative constitutional opinions to governmental departments, policy think tanks, and advocacy organizations on the constitutional validity and fundamental rights implications of proposed legislation, executive orders, and regulatory frameworks.
Jurisdictions
Quick Reference
How We Help
The right combination of services depending on your constitutional & public interest law matter.
Common Questions
Article 32 grants the right to approach the Supreme Court directly for enforcement of fundamental rights, and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar called it 'the heart and soul of the Constitution.' Article 226 empowers High Courts to issue writs for enforcement of fundamental rights and 'for any other purpose,' making Article 226 broader in scope than Article 32. While Article 32 is itself a fundamental right and cannot be suspended except during Emergency, Article 226 provides a wider remedy as it covers not only fundamental rights violations but also any legal right infringement.
Any Indian citizen or organization acting in good faith and for the public interest can file a PIL before the Supreme Court (under Article 32) or the High Court (under Article 226). The petitioner need not be personally aggrieved; the PIL can be filed on behalf of disadvantaged groups, the environment, or the public at large. However, the Supreme Court has laid down guidelines to prevent misuse, and PILs filed for personal gain, political motives, or frivolous purposes can attract costs and penalties.
During a National Emergency proclaimed under Article 352, the President can suspend the enforcement of fundamental rights under Article 19 by an order under Article 358. Additionally, under Article 359, the President can suspend the right to move any court for enforcement of specific fundamental rights during an Emergency. However, after the 44th Amendment Act, 1978, the right to life and personal liberty under Articles 20 and 21 cannot be suspended even during an Emergency, ensuring baseline constitutional protection at all times.
The basic structure doctrine, established by the Supreme Court in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), holds that while Parliament has wide powers to amend the Constitution under Article 368, it cannot alter or destroy the 'basic structure' or 'essential features' of the Constitution. These features include the supremacy of the Constitution, democratic and republican form of government, secular character, separation of powers, federal character, and judicial review. Any constitutional amendment violating the basic structure can be struck down by the Supreme Court.
Urgent writ petitions, particularly those involving habeas corpus or fundamental rights of life and liberty, can be listed for hearing within days or even on the same day through mentioning before the Chief Justice. Regular writ petitions are typically listed for admission hearing within 2-6 weeks of filing. After admission, final hearing timelines vary significantly depending on the court's docket, complexity of the matter, and the number of parties involved, and can range from a few months to several years in the Supreme Court.
Connect with our verified legal professionals specializing in constitutional & public interest law matters across all courts in India. Get expert guidance today.